Видео

Jin

@@KlangelihleMalinga-pb7ds آمين

@@annaParvin-pv7ts الله أعلم

Maybe eyes were open and sometimes you can tell it by eyes, or it’s a figurative speech and she got angry quickly,, ALLAHU ALEEM

The shaykh held the opinion that face does not need to be covered for the woman. Allah knows best

@@Ibnmehmedit doesn’t mean his wife didn’t wear Niqab. Rather I am 100% sure all of his womenfolk wore Niqab and this is proven when sheikh Al Albani himself told sheikh wasiullah abbas to dress his daughter with more appropriate clothing eventho she was 2 years old. Only because the sheikh held that the niqab is not fardh due to a scholastic fiqh angle, it doesn’t mean he didn’t make his wife wear one

​But he held the opinion that its better to cover the face tho, his daughter Hassanah even wrote a book defending the opinion of her father its called الأفضلية لستر المرأة وججها وكفيها لا لكشفهما @@Ibnmehmed

@@safynwaislam7111 Wa Jazak. I am not the Shaykh. I just reuploaded the clip. Find the Shaykh’s channel link attached in the info section of the video.

@FJA95 not a problem, Akhi

#31 A Mountain Of Gold || Seerah || AbdulRahman Hassan. The link to the full video can be found in the more information section of the video.

الله أعلم

No, he didn’t remarry. He had three other wives before her. But she lived with him alone She was his last wife Ummul Fadl

www.emaanlibrary.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/The-Marriage-Guide-According-to-the-Sunnah-of-the-Prophet-%EF%B7%BA-Sh.-al-Albani.pdf

Kitaab az zifaaf

Adaab azifaaf

وعليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته Ameen, Wa Jazak. In English it is called The Marriage Guide: According to the Sunnah of the Prophet (ﷺ). You can easily find the full PDF if you Google it Insha’Allah.

ما شاء الله

What is his name?

@@mohammedmujahiddinsuhiyini4064 Dr Michael Mosley

Michael Mosley

Can you share that information and reference.

Placing the hands after Ruku Bismillaah: Shaykh Abdul Azeez Bin Baaz رحمه الله said: The one who thinks about the Hadiths mentioned above i.e., the Hadith related by Sahl, and that related by Wa'il ibn Hujr, and others, will realize that they indicate that it is an act of Shari`ah to place the right hand upon the left hand when standing in Salah both before and after Ruku`, because there is no details differentiating between the two postures and in fact there is no legal text that differentiates between the two postures. Moreover, the commandment of placing the right hand on the left forearm during Salah was stated also in the Hadith reported by Sahl. Yet, It is not explained when to do so while in Salah. If we contemplate what is related in this regard, it will be clear to us that it is an act of Sunnah to place the palms on the knees when in a state of Ruku`, to place them on the ground when in a state of Sujud, and to place them on both one's thighs and knees while in the state of sitting. Thus, it is only the posture of standing that is not mentioned. Accordingly, it is inferred from the Hadith related by Sahl that it is such posture that is meant. This is very clear. As for the Hadith related by Wa'il, there is a declaration on the part of Wa'il رضي الله عنه that he saw the Prophet صلي الله عليه وسلم holding his left hand with his right one when he was standing in Salah. It was reported by Al Nasaa'i with an authentic chain of narrators. Such wording given by Wa'il implies the standing in the two positions. As for the one who differentiates between them, he is obliged to present evidence for this. We have already referred to this at the beginning of this article. Third: Scholars state that the wisdom behind placing one's right hand on one's left hand is that this brings one closer to Khushu` (the heart being submissively attuned to the act of worship) and humility and keeps one away from fiddling. This was discussed earlier in the opinion of Al Hafizh Ibn Hajar. Since the one who is performing Salah should observe this meaning before and after Ruku`, it is impermissible to differentiate between the two postures except when a differentiating authentic text exists, which would be inevitably adopted. As for the saying of our brother scholar: "This was not mentioned at all in any of the Hadiths on (describing) Salah though they are numerous. Had this had any origin, it would have been reported to us even through just one means," our reply is that this is not true. Rather, what indicates this was actually reported in the Hadiths related by Sahl, Wa'il, and others as mentioned above. As for the one who excludes the posture of standing after Ruku`, he has to raise the reliable manifest evidence in support of this exclusion. As for his saying (may Allah grant him success): "This is supported by the fact that this was neither performed by any of the Salaf nor was it mentioned by any of the scholars of Hadith, as far as I know," our reply is that such a claim is very strange because it lacks evidence that none of the Salaf performed it. Rather, this is the very evidence that they used to hold their hands when standing after Ruku`, because had they performed other than that, this would have been reported to us and because the Hadiths mentioned above indicate that it is an act of Shari`ah to hold one's hand when standing in Salah, whether before or after Ruku`. This is what is implicated from the title that Imam Al Bukhari رحمه الله gave as we have mentioned at the beginning of this article. The opinion stated by Al-Hafizh Ibn Hajar implies the same meaning. Had any of the Salaf performed other than that, this would have been reported to us. Moreover, it was not reported from the Prophet صلي الله عليه وسلم that he released his hands when standing after Ruku`. Had he done so, this would have been reported to us because the Companions صلي الله عليه وسلم reported from the Prophet what is less important than this regarding his sayings and actions صلي الله عليه وسلم. It was discussed earlier in the opinion of Ibn Abdul Barr رحمه الله that nothing contradictory to holding the hands was reported from the Prophet صلي الله عليه وسلم. Al Hafizh affirmed such an opinion and we know of no narration proving anything else. According to what we have stated, it should be clear that what was stated by our brother Shaykh Muhammad Nasir Al Din in this issue is a proof against him, not supporting him when pondering and considering the rules followed by scholars. May Allah forgive us and him. May He grant us all forgiveness. We hope that after reading what we have stated in this article the truth will be clear to him. He could return to it, because the truth is the sought after goal. { Majmu Al Fataawa Al Kubrah } And Allaah عزوجل knows best.

What about the (ra fal Aydhan) ? Iam convinced that Hanafi Madhab is recomended to apply the raising of the hands

Eh, people were fasting much before prophet Mohammed. It is in the Quran. Quran was sent down much before men started to write Hadith. It is even in the bible, in the old testament. Bible was here before Quran even. So Muslims shud stop always think everything came from prophet Mohammed. There is no single reference that prophet Mohammed said this and that. Lol.

آمين وجزاك

You can, no problem إن شاء الله

Mind your own business. Muslims do not even follow the Quran lol.

Both scholars may Allah have mercy on them made their ijtihad , and if we can make our own and choose between the 2 InshAllah that’s fine

@@theonlygoodisinfollowingth2433 brother first thing in musnade Ahmad I think the sahabi described prophet when raising hands from ruku unless it comes back to its normal position the hanbalis take this that come to Itd place means the place where it was before ruku but their conclusion is not correct cause in another hadees sahabi said prophet raised his hand unless it comes to its normal position so where was his hand before takbeer means before starting takbeer his hands were so what when he said Allah u Akbar did he not raised his hand of course no the general meaning of that hadees is that when he raised his hand he would not do that in fast position but unless his whole bones comes torest with humbleness similarly when he raised from ruku he would stand fully with humbleness then go to ruku that what that hadees referencing through jazakAllah

ruclips.net/video/TrlFL1272yw/видео.html&ab_channel=HudaTV

Name the salafs who are with you in this opinion. This is a shaaz masalah.

@@mdwasimiqbal2566 name the salaf who specifically says to let hands go on the sides after ruku', give me the athar source and its authentication

I love this comment please never give up in spreading truth

Which fitna are talking about? The only fitnah in this world are men. God says do not judge, and asked men FIRST to low their gaze. You cannot blame a woman when you cannot lower your gaze. Nasty men even rape women who do not even show their skin LOL. There is no excuses to rape women. No women can be blamed for the evilness of men who do not lower their gaze. Even children ar getting raped, so children also do fitnah? LOL. Get a life.

Which fitna are talking about? The only fitnah in this world are men. God says do not judge, and asked men FIRST to low their gaze. You cannot blame a woman when you can low your gaze. Nasty men even rape women who do not even show their skin LOL. There is no excuses to rape women. No women can be blamed for the evilness of men who does not lower their gaze. Even children ar getting raped, so children also do fitnah? LOL. Get a life.

Which fitna are talking about? The only fitnah in this world are men. God says do not judge, and asked men FIRST to low their gaze. You cannot blame a woman when you can low your gaze. Nasty men even rape women who do not even show their skin LOL. There is no excuses to rape women. No women can be blamed for the evilness of men who does not lower their gaze. Even children ar getting raped, so children also do fitnah? LOL. Get a life.

Which fitna are talking about? The only fitnah in this world are men. God says do not judge, and asked men FIRST to low their gaze. You cannot blame a woman when you can low your gaze. Nasty men even rape women who do not even show their skin LOL. There is no excuses to rape women. No women can be blamed for the evilness of men who does not lower their gaze. Even children ar getting raped, so children also do fitnah? LOL. Get a life.

yes authentic,its not wether its hard to believe or not,we dont use logic,look at description

what are you talking about you jahil

@@user-yq2if6ld9h lol... spoken like a true ‘salafi’, full of anger and venom 😂

@@dlhussain81 i'm full of venom and you that lie about the deen of Allah are not? lol your ignorance. educate yourself befor you speak jahil.

@@user-yq2if6ld9h the prophet ‎صلى الله عليه وسلم was the opposite of being full of venom. In Islam we are told not to call others kafir because it will fall back on us, so similarly think before you call others names.

@@user-yq2if6ld9h what lie am I speaking? The keffiyah that has nothing to do with Islam but is an Arab cultural item? Fine for Arabs to wear but why does a non Arab wear it thinking it’s a Sunnah to wear that particular scarf?

ameen

Nobody is saying that Imam Ash-Shafi'ee misguided the Ummah on purpose. He made Ijtihaad based upon the evidences he had at the time. This is what all the Imams had done. But the fact is that not all of them can be correct. We have the follow the proof i.e. whatever the Quran & the Sunnah points too. More Ahadith were available later on this of why you find the the Madhab of Imam Ahmed to contain the most proofs within his rulings and least amount of Qiyaas. Hence, his Madhab is most closest to the truth in most things. However, NOBODY is infallible, so we say EVERYONE minus the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم ) made mistakes. I do apologize if this offends you this was never my intention. May Allah guide the Muslim Ummah to the straight path and keep them firm upon it. Ameen!

@@FJA95 aameen